Israel is Wasted Its seed is no more!

The History of the Hebrew ancestors of the Jews is very very murkey. Its so murkey that its even the Jew haters an opening to declare the pre 9th century BCE null and void, Any excuse to deny the Jews their place in history brings the shiver of excitement to the Jew haters, whether they be western Nazis or Islamists. It began with the book, the Bible Unearthed by Israel Finkelstein and Neil Asher Silberman. In summing up decades of Israel archaeology, they could not find much evidence of the Exodus, Joshua, Kings David and Solomon. Anti-Semites cried with great glee the Bible is bogus. Although many of these very same anti-semites are scripture quoting automatons.

Silberman and Finklestein could discover no evidence of any journey of the Hebrews from Egypt. The time scale for Joshua's conquest of Cana'an could not be found. Either the burned cities were too early in the Bronze Age or much later in the Israelite kingdom.

They theorized with much supporting evidence than Hebrews were revolutionaries that overthrew the Cana'anite upper classes. They fled to Judea and Samaria to live simple yet free lives with a personal relation to God. One God.The first evidence of advanced civilization appear in Samaria as the Kingdom of Israel. By the In short time it grew powerful with megalithic buildings and palaces. The evidence supports this and supports that once destroyed by the Assyrian Empire the small virtually non-existant Kingdom of Judah replaced it. Just before or just after this destruction work was done on writing the most important piece of literature in Western civilization-The Old Testment of the Bible. Considering that much of the Bible is verified after the 8th century; its very likely that the older material is based on some facts. The cosmpolitan nature of King Josiahs Kingdom contrasts to the village existence 100 years previously.

Silberman and Finketein theorize the David was more a Robin Hood figure than a great king. Ditto with Solomon.

There is no evidence for Kingdoms just confederations of tribes.

But military historians point to the undeniable war stategies placed in real locales in Israel having to do with the war campaigns of Joshua, the Judges Gideon, Deborah, Samson, David and his son. Strategies from the Bible were followed in World war Two resulting is allied victories. So there was a realness here

To silence the OT deniers there is tiny bits of evidence. Theres the Ipuwer Papyrus which indicates a great upheaveal in Egyptian society about the same time as The megavolcano at Thera exploded. Excavations on Crete have shown that the megavolcano nearly destroyed the Minoan seafaring civilization by tsumami! So its easy to see tsumamis wreaking havoc and deluging the Nile Delta. The 10 plagues recited every Passover can be explained by the effects of such a catatastrophe, Canadian Jewish filmaker, Simcha Jacobovici, has made it one of his largest projects to prove the Exodus. He take on it includes another exodus of Hebrews to Mycenae. Where he feels the Ark of the Covenant ended up. Supporting this is a letter wrtitten decades after Alexander the Great conquered the Middle East. Its from King Arius of Sparta to the High Priest Onias of Judeaindicating a common ancestry. from the Avatar filmaker James Cameron has worked on this with Jacobovici. Explaining the Pillars of Fire/Light other have theorized that Mr Sinai was a volcano in whats now Saudi Arabia. Possible land bridges crossing the Red Sea have been found at the Eilat side of the Gulf of Aqaba and across the straits of Tiran as well.Josephus points to the origin of the Jews with the Semitic invasions of the Hyksos that lasted 300 years and may have ended in a great exodus.And Egyptian historian Manetho mentions two Exoduses One involving the Hyksos. The other one has been linked to a possible exile of monotheist Pharoah Akhenaten after an overthrow. This might explain the Hebraic one god Concept as developed from Akhenaten ong god aton Concept. This was all very circumstantal.

WHo was Moses? Was he the brother of Ahmose? Was he Akhenaten? Or was he the brother of Ahmose mentioned in the Ipuwer Papyrus? Or possibly an exiled Hyksos monarch. We dont know at this point. To say the Exodus was fiction is a little premature considering the leads. The Exodus is certianly not proven but neither has it been disproven like Joshua's conquests. When Greeks visited Judea after Alexander took the area from Darius they remarked the how obsessed the Judeans were with this ancient figure Moshe. Considering the the names of Egyptian Pharoahs, Ahmose, Tutmose, (Tothmoses), Rameses (Ramoses). Kmose (Kamoses) all around the era of a possible Hebrew or Hyksos emigration, was it a coincidence about Moses?

 And notice the bank place before the name Moses. A space possibly indicating belief in an invisible God. Its similar to depictions of the Ark of Covenant, where the two angels or sphinxes towards an empty space representing that invisible deity.

OT deniers suffered at setback when a stelae was found in Tel Dan in Northern Israel. This inscribed stone celebrated the King of Syria or Arams victory of the Houses of Israel and David. Notice it was David and not Judah. So David was such an impressive figure that his name preempted the name of Judah.

Another stelae from the same period celebrates the King of Moab's victory over the Kingdoms of Omri (Israel) and David (Judah). You might be able to infer that so dominating were the Hebrew kingdoms that stelae comemmorating setbacks were important to ther enemies.So however insignificant Judah was it was a frequent ally or it dominating neighbor. And for some reason despite the clashes they did have Judah was never conqured despites it Rhode Island size to Israel.

The most dramatic evidence of Israel emerging out of the murkiness is the Merneptah stelas. The Pharoah mentions a list of nations he defeated starting with the most powerful Libyans. The Libyans were allies of the mysterious combination of Seafaring nations, the Sea Peoples.

That particular age was marked by the end of the use of bronze which was the whole purpose of the Sea trade with the use of iron. That brought in land empires like Egypt later on. The Sea Peoples included Greek peoples and Semitic peoples. The Egyptians were the only nation to survive thise age of anarchy as the Hittite Empire crmbled and the coast of Cana'an was depopulated with survivors moving inland where the Hebrews later emerged.

One Sea People the Egyptians soundly defeated was the Peleshet. They forced the invaders to settle in Gaza and became the Phillistines associated with the Isrealites wars and David and Goliath.

The Merneptah document of stone was of a series of wars between two greater wars the Egyptians barely won against the Sea peoples confederation.

Before the Sea People wars nomads called Habiru had tormented the ruler of a pre-Hebrew Jebusite Jerusalem, so that he pleaded for help from the Pharoah. The Pharoah had evidented picked him as a local vassal.This was documented by the Armana letters dated to Akhenaten's reign.

Was there some connection to Biblical rulers like Priest-King Melchizedek?

The King of (Jeru)Salem who was very personally involved with the patriarch Abraham.Abraham is dated to an earlier Bronze age period coinciding with Hyksos domination of Egypt

Merneptah mentions many large to small victories. The defeated are Cana'an, Ashkelon (the Phillistines), Gezer and Israel. Thery arent referred to as a country but as a people. Silberman and Finklestein think that Israel was most likely nomadic or semi-nomadic people as indcated by their settlements resembled a circle of wagons turned into stone houses.

The people of Israel's defeat in 1208-9 bce is described as "Israel is laid waste, its seed is no more". There is even a heiroglyph of Merneptah metaphorically whipping his enemy. It practically sounds genocidal but it was common for the Pharoah to exaggerate because it enhanced his standing back in Memphis.   Much like the Palestinians and Arabs do today.What I find particularly striking is that Israels first mention, despite being a congomeration of nomads, is the declaration of their destruction. This theme of utter destruction was repeated by Haddad of Aram (Syria) Mesha of Moab, The Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Seleucid Syrian Greeks, the Romans (twice), Crusaders, Kingdom of Spain, the Cossacks, The Russian Empire, Nazi Germany and manmy Jew haters on the internet today. Thats 3000 years of unfulfilled promises of extermination.

No people or country can match that resistance to obliteration.

Your Home on Earth is not Determined by race, genetics, skin color, bloodline or religious text

ONE TOOL USED AGAINST JEWS CLAIM TO ISRAEL IS THAT THEY ARE NOT SEMITES. NOW SEMITES AS A RACIAL GROUPING ENDED WITH THE ABANDONMENT OF RACE THEORY AS A NAZI BELIEF RATHER THAN PROVEN FACT .THE ACCUSATION BY MODERN DAY ADHERENTS OF NAZI RACE THEORY IS THAT THEY ARE

KHAZARS. ONE OF SEVERAL PEOPLES WHO ADOPTED JUDAISM. THIS MAY IN SOME EXTENT BE TRUE OR NOT.

JEWS ARE OBVIOUSLY AN AMALGAM OF MANY PEOPLES. THEY ARE A MULTI-RACIAL PEOPLE. BIGOTS USE WHITE ASHKENAZI TERM QUITE OFTEN, THIS IS A BLATANT REFLECTION OF THEIR OWN WHITE CENTERED BELIEFS OF SUPREMACISM. SEPHARDIC JEWS, MIZRACHI JEWS, INDIAN JEWS, FALASHA ETHOPIAN JEWS, AND CONVERTS FRM SOUTH AMERICA, THE FAR EAST SHOW A DIVERSITY THATS DETESTED AS MONGREL BY ARYAN PUREBRED TYPES. JEWS ARE NO LONGER A JUDEAN PEOPLE. THEY HAVE SEMITIC CONNECTIONS THROUGH CHROMOSOMES AND LANGUAGE.

AND THIS A PATTERN GOING BACK TO THE BERBERS, EDOMITES, AS WELL AS THE ANCIENT MOABITES. BEFORE THE TALMUD, THE TORAH SHOWCASED THIS IN RUTH. SHE WAS A MOABITE WHO CONVERTED, AND DESPITE GREAT DIFFICULTY REMAINED AN ISRAELITE. AND HER DESCENDENT WAS KING DAVID.SO WHAT IS THE CLAIM OF JEWS TO ISRAEL? ITS SIMPLY THEY BOUGHT LAND IN ZION, CARED FOR IT A DEFENDED IT AT GREAT COST! THERE IS AND SHOULD BE NO BLOODLINE CLAIM TO ISRAEL OR ANY LAND.

Who Killed Christ?

Who Killed Christ?

That question still is wet on the lips of hatemongers. They salivate with the anticipation of their roar. The glint of pleasure is in their eyes. It’s a glint of a self convinced self evident truth. They think there’s still one historical fact they can unabashedly guilt freely blame on their phantoms – The Jews.


Few of us are exposed to religious criticism by Biblical scholarship and especially archaeological disputation. The media stays away from these sacrosanct subjects. They fear the fury of the religious. But much of the Bible stands on a fast eroding beachscape. Some of the OT or the Torah has been demystified due to historical evaluations. But the power of the Old Testament is still pretty much retained. Its strength is in the literature. Facts are not important there but the value is. Its quality over quantity.

But the New Testament is another matter. Its is accepted as fact that much of the Gospels have been forged, edited and rewritten. The Gospels written by Hellenic converts to Saul of Tarsus/St. Paul’s version of magical paganized Judaism. The original Evangelists had varying degrees of hostility to their former comrade religion. They needed to support Christianity and distance themselves from Judaism. Blaming the Jews or blaming the victim started here. transforming Judas from the Beloved disciple to the great traitor symbolic of all Jews. There is much accepted evidence that Jesus never fought verbal battles with the Pharisees. In fact once studied you see that Pharisees are applauded in the Gospels and the word Pharisee is substituted for Sadducee. The Sadducees were a small sect of strict scripturists that were quisling for the Roman occupation force.




St Paul heard everything second-hand. Christianity is Judaism by a few degrees of separation. It began as hearsay or rumour of what St. Paul thought Judaism was. Through Hellenistic pagan eyes St. Paul, a Greek fan or fanatic summed up Judaism. He made Jesus Christ out of Yeshua Ben Joseph, The fossilization is so complete we can detect practically nothing of the flesh and blood of the historical Jesus. We only see, whats left, a frozen stone image of Jesus on a crucifix. Exposed to mystery religions and the Gods who were sacrificed for world continuance he could only relate to those ideas.


He was never a Pharisee. He was minimally exposed to the secretive and promising Sadducees who he worked for. Until of course the vision of Christ in his mind.


Yeshua who likely survived the crucifixion was a candidate for Messiah. He was possibly a descendent of David. But he was a learned man, therefore a rabbi and Pharisee. Even today the Roman Catholic Church begrudgingly accepts he was NEVER a Christian. The sand beneath the foundations of these orthodox beliefs are draining away. Time shall reveal all even after 2000 years. Yeshua was on the cross only a few hours. All crucified men were removed on the Sabbath. That was easily survivable. Yeshua seeing his crucifixion did not incite a Judaic Revolution had to leave. But he promised his disciples he would return. Tales of Jesus returning as ghost, avatar or God were added in later Gospels. It was a great tale meant to entrance half Judaized followers. There is even speculation Jesus/Yeshua did return at the beginning of the Jewish War in 66 CE. Where was he? France? maybe. But many accounts in Persia, India and Tibet put him there as Saint Issa. As he travelled, Paul invented his Jesus as Zeus religion to the aggravation of Judeans and irritation of ther Church of Jerusalem.


But the colouring of Jews did not end with the Evangelists. Eventually Christianity became the religion of Rome. It has to be accepted by Rome. and sacrifices were made. Women were demoted and Jews were demonized. Even more distance had to be placed between the Jews and the new faith. With the power interlocked with Rome could the Romans be blamed for the GREAT GODS death?? And so the rewriting continued. The Jews had to be blamed and re-editing would accomplish this. It had already begun with the Evangelists of the Gospels.

The Jews had to be made the scapegoats. Im sure that whoever reworked the NT never in their wildest dreams imagined this would end in massacres throughout the Middle Ages and continuing into a near extermination of the Jews! Biblical scholarship has seen to some scholars dismay, the evidence of this great forgeries. And these evaluations are slowly leaching into popular culture. The Ages of Reason and Enlightenment have made superstition and abracadabra and presto chango into entertainment.




Still many still cling to magical irrational beliefs.


There is nothing more magically irrational than to blame groups of people for what their ancestors allegedly did. This type of thinking that flees away from reason and deduction is welcome on the internet today. Conspiracy theory is usually devoid of rationality and is similar to what religion is losing – the faith.


So even today there are fundamentalist Christians who still actually blame the death of the candidate for Messiah on the Jews themselves. So it must be pointed out that Jesus died on a cross. And the Judean form of execution was NOT that but stoning. And the evidence is there to be seen as Jesus/Yeshua himself saves a young woman from stoning. Its right there in the adulterated Gospels.It couldn’t be changed that Jesus died on a Roman cross. The cross by 330 CE was too important.


Despite the obviousness, the blame was irrationally affixed in the New Testament. The crowds HAD to be turned against Jesus even though they cheered him in his entry into the city on the back of a donkey.


With all these deductions there are still those who love to chew on the nugget of hate and bigotry will still not spit the vile element out. They are too addicted to its demonic pleasure of hatred.

The Empire of Greater Israel

Jew Haters, Israel haters  but not Anti-Zionists (few if any)  always distort the size of the Jewish state by semantics. They use elaborate language meant to inflame the ignorant, confused and other newbies about Israel expansion. But these people are very good with propaganda and use socialist/leftist terminology, or ancent christian anti-semtic terminology, depending on whether they left wing or rightwing, to misrepresent the reality of Israel in the middleeast.. Islamist Arabs and other anti-Israeli Muslims use both approaches.

Another word thats incorrect and meant to outrage is "aparthied".

I encounter the hardcore types on forums. They are hardcore on the left and right. But the lines get blurred as rightist pretend to be left and vics versa. But manyhave no ideology except hatred of Jews.

They repeat  incessantly that Israel is expanding and confiscating Arab lands all over the Middle East. A good example is the absurd Greater Israel post that Israel has it's goal on an Empire from the Eurphrates to the Nile, since King David had such a realm. I've already written about this.

Those a little more practical  go on to point out examples like Israel conquering Lebanon since they "occupy" Sheba'a Farm disputed boundary issueon the Golan Heights. Since Lebanon and Syria never resolved  the problem BEFORE 1967 its now balloned into a major international outrage of occupied Lebanon.

They also mention the Israel-PLO War invasion of Lebanon in 1982. But they NEVER mention that the PLO controlled their own section of Lebanon from 1976 to 1983 and launched Katushya rockets AT Northern Israel in 1978 and AGAIN in 1982. The 1982 incident led Iasraels to attempt to destoy the PLO by surrounding Beirut.  To prevent future attacks Israel set up a Christian state in southern Lebanon. This too is pointed at as expansion despit no settlements ever existing. So they ignore the point od Israeli withdrawal in 2000 which sparked the 2nd intifada as Arabs salivated at perceived Israeli weakness.

The 2006 Hezbullah War is mentioned as a land grab attempt when its quite clearly a self defense measure to stop missiles raining on Northern Israel for a month. They also point to the territories in the West Bank and Gaza which were never annexed. In fact they are silent when you mention the  Expulsion of  Jewish settlers from Gaza.

But whats pointed out with great glee is the territories conquered in the 6 Day War. Thats expansion thay cry with pretend wounded cries. Sinai was occupied but after Anwar Saat went to Jerusalem and later signed a peace treaty, that resulted in his assaisination, Israel withdrew section by section from the Sinai including dismantling settlements like Yamit.

Yes Israel DID annex the Golan and East Jerusalem. Those areas when occupied by Arabs were exploited and used as launchpads for weapons fire INTO Israel. The West Bank  or Samaria/Judea   remained settler pfree for most of the first 10 years. And since Jordan refused to negotiate LAND FOR PEACE it remain in Israel hands. King Hussein sat on his hands capitulating to the Arab League and their proxies the PLO. Exventually all rights to that part of Jordan was given to the PLO.

Jewish settler consider these lands part of Jewish history and they create settlements betwen Arab towns most of the time on fallow Arab land. This I must concede is the only expansion I can see.

But if you look at Israel in comparison with its hostile neighbors on a map you are astonshed

You can barely see Israel and the proto-state of Palestine. Only Lebanon is smaller. Egypt, Jordam (which intially WAS part of Palestine), Syria, Saudi Arbia, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, and Algeria loom like Soviet Russia over Poland! They are humongous mega expanses. Israel haters MAKE sure never to bring maps into the debate! The Arabs are greedy in not being able to recognize a tiny sliver of a non-Muslim state in their midst.

They consider this a loss for Arab Muslim heritage. These lands once conquired should alway remain Muslim,. Its their UMMA lands forever! This applies to other losses like Spain. and the Balkans too but in a much lesser way. Those loses arent as fresh and raw like Israel! They view the area from Morocco to Persia (Iran) as a great Arab carpet mosaic with reds, greens, blacks and white suddenly infected by alien blue Israel. So in reality 19 mile wide Israel is very small but its exaggerated  to a huge size by the outraged psychology of the Arab mind.

Jesus Christ was a Zionist!

Jesus Christ or Yeshua of the Nazareans was indeed a Zionist. What is a Zionist? Zionists have always desired to continue a Jewish presence at the point of origin. That's Zion a hill in Jerusalem.This includes all efforts to repel those who would like to convert the Jews to other religions. Conversion efforts continue to this day. The Greek Empire of Syria of the Selucid dynasty set up idols to squash the Jewish identity and any propensity to revolt. This actually created a revolt and susequent war that gave Judea and surrounding areas autonomy. So when the Romans moved and began to systematically usurp power from local rulers a century later the reaction was similar. When Emperor Augustus created the Caesar as God concept he demanded the whole Empire religiously capitulate. Jews refused to abandon their worship. The Romans derisively called Yahweh their invisible God. When the Romans took over Judea they made the local rulers and the temple priests into puppets. Eventually governors like Pontus Pilate took over from local kings enraging the populace. The sentiment was now not only restore Judea (Zion) and other Jewish areas, but the Temple as well.

Alas, the Revolution never materialized. Now a crucifixtion survivor Jesus was a wanted man. Wanted notices of Jesus still exist. So he had to leave Jerusalem, Judea and the area. He most likely picked the most safe area away from control of Rome. He might very well have traveled to Parthia (Persia). Maybe he did go to Afghanistan, India, Tibet and central Asia. But he told his followers he would return. There is evidence he did; just in time for the First Jewish War against Rome.He believed that the Jews sovereignity needed to be restored. He was a Zionist!!


Of course wanna-be Jew Paul later merged his pagan ideas of Apollo like ressurrection with Jesus survival of the cross and promise to return into a gentile inclusive religion. But thats another story.....
Alas, the Revolution never materialized. Now a crucifixtion survivor Jesus was a wanted man. Wanted notices of Jesus still exist. So he had to leave Jerusalem, Judea and the area. He most likely picked the most safe area away from control of Rome. He might very well have traveled to Parthia (Persia). Maybe he did go to Afghanistan, India, Tibet and central Asia. But he told his followers he would return. There is evidence he did; just in time for the First Jewish War against Rome. He believed that the Jews sovereignity needed to be restored. He was a Zionist!!



Of course wanna-be Jew Paul later merged his pagan ideas of Apollo like ressurrection with Jesus survival of the cross and promise to return into a gentile inclusive religion. But thats another story...


Since the leaders were comprised as quislings poular grassroots personalities attrempted to restore the Kingdom of Jerusalem. Some were of the royal line going back to King David. Jesus the Christ was one such rebel.There were many who attempted open revolt like Judas of Galilee others took up the mantle of critic/prophet like John the Baptist (mikveh). Still others declared miracles would follow the presence into Jerusalem. All were crucified as historical research and archaeology have confirmed. Jesus was one person to try a different tack. He believed as the claimant for Kingshp was based on his royal blood; his crucifixtion would bring about open revoltion in Judea. The quislings Anas and Caiaphas opposed this along with the Romans. Enforcement of the "peace" was a Roman operation. In the Gospels it quite obvious if one read the words that Jesus planned it in detail. Judas his most beloved disciple was made a very convincing betrayer. Jesus wanted to be crucified. In this way he would cause a revolution anf a following revolution. Then he would rule as Messiah or King of Israel, Judea and the Jews. He picked an excellent time so that he would by on the cross for only 6 hours because Romans acceeded to the Jews religious demands that no one be tortured on Sabbath. Six hours though excruciating was surviable. A revived Christ would the call for liberation. There is evidence that there were poisons or drugs used then to imitate death; and speculation that the liquid presented to Jesus/Yeshua contained such.

Palestinians appeared in the Bible as coming from Crete or its empire.== Totally Incorrect



The writer confuses the Phillistines with the Palestinians. They are totally different peoples separated by millenia. The Phillistines are theorized as most like Sea People of Greek origin who settled in the Gaza area after the Sea Peoples Wars of upheaveal in the 12 century BCE. Its been said that the Phillistines are Pelgasians who settled in the area after defeat by the Egyptians in 2 wars. The Pelgasians were just one of the Sea People Nations who were a diverse group including Libyans,and Iberians. It has been also posited that that the key to the Sea Peoples power was the bronze trade, That trade was replaced by iron technology in the 12th century BCE.
The Pelgasians origin is unknown as they destroyed the Mainland Greek civilization the Myceneans. The Myceneans had overrun the Minoans a hundred years before. The Minoans civilization has been devasted and nearly destroyed by a great tsunami from the volcanic eruption at Thera or Santorini.
The Phillistines stated conquering from the west and the coast while the Hebrew people expanded from the Judean hills in the east. They clashed in the Old Testament in stories about Samson and David among others. Eventually they were defeated by the Israelites and waves of conquest by the Assyrians , Babylonians and Persians. By Roman times they were extinct and assimilated.
Herodotus mentions visiting the area in the 600's BCE. When the word Phillistine was translated to Latin by Roman scholars centuries later it was called Palaestina. Emperor Hadrian upon defeating Bar Kochba and the Judeans in the Second Jewish War (135 CE) chose that name for the entire area to erase the name of Judea.

The Phillistines stated conquering from the west and the coast while the Hebrew people expanded from the Judean hills in the east. They clashed in the Old Testament in stories about Samson and David among others. Eventually they were defeated by the Israelites and waves of conquest by the Assyrians , Babylonians and Persians. By Roman times they were extinct and assimilated.
Herodotus mentions visiting the area in the 600's BCE. When the word Phillistine was translated to Latin by Roman scholars centuries later it was called Palaestina. Emperor Hadrian upon defeating Bar Kochba and the Judeans in the Second Jewish War (135 CE) chose that name for the entire area to erase the name of Judea.
And so until the Arab conquest in 642 it was called Palestine. In that time it had become the European name for the area. The Arabs called it Lower Syria. It had not become popular name among the Arabs until the Crusades. Still it was not popular enough for the subsequent conquerors the Mamelukes and Ottoman Turks to use the term. Arabs unable to pronounce the P to this day call it Falistine. When the British Empire took the area as a League of Nations mandate it revived the word for the colony.
During the colony period Jews and Arabs called themselves Jewish and Arab Palestinians.
When the Jews became Israelis in 1948 the Arabs were left without an identity. They were not Jordanian or Egyptian and were occupied by Arabs of those states.
Just before the 1967 Six Day War, Yasir Arafat in a brilliant move revived the term "Palestinians" to mean Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza. This differentiated them from Egypt and Jordan and gave then an identity as a people and nation. Artificial but real.
So todays Palestinians are Arabs who were segregated from other nations by the Arab League as a cancer to continually fester alongside Israel
The most of the Muslim Arabs are a result of migrations of Arab tribes from Arabia from the 9th to 12th centuries across the area into North Africa, The Christian Arabs are descendant of Canaanite or Phoenician and Hebrew peoples from Amorite and Aramean migrations in the second and first millenna BCE To this add the Greek people from the Hellenistic migrations after Alexander the Great.
So many Palestinian Arabs are likely to have some descent from Jews from the time of Jesus.